|
|
| |
About LACERA Homepage > LACERA Boards > Board Committees > IBL Committee > IBL Minutes 12-10-09 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
IBL MINUTES DECEMBER 10, 2009 |
|
| |
|
| |
INSURANCE, BENEFITS & LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE MINUTES 12-10-09
PRESENT
- Simon S. Russin, Vice Chair
- Edward L. Blecksmith
- Ed C. Morris
- James P. Harris, Alternate
ABSENT
- William de la Garza, Chair
ALSO ATTENDING:
BOARD MEMBERS AT LARGE
- Sadonya Antebi
- Yves Chery
- Les Robbins
STAFF, ADVISORS, PARTICIPANTS
- Lita Payne
- Cassandra Smith
- Mercer Human Resource Consulting
- Clay Levister
- Laurie Silva
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Russin at 11:30 a.m.
- APPOINTMENT OF VOTING MEMBER(S) IN THE EVENT ONE OR MORE REGULAR COMMITTEE
MEMBERS ARE ABSENT
The Chair appointed Mr. Harris a voting member of the Committee.
- APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 5, 2009
A motion was made by Mr. Morris, seconded by Mr. Harris, to approve the
minutes of the special meeting of November 5, 2009.
The motion passed unanimously.
- ACTION ITEMS
- Recommendation as submitted by Lita Payne, Director, Retiree
Health Care: Recommend that the Board of Retirement request the Board
of Supervisors to support and adopt California Government Code Section
31696.1(b). (Memo dated December 2, 2009)
LACERA sponsors a comprehensive Long Term Care (LTC) product through
MetLife for retired county employees. Providing this Long Term Care
product to the active employees of Los Angeles County would facilitate
a seamless transition into retirement and could increase employee participation,
as well as providing lower premiums and increased eligibility. The
coordination and participation of active employees in the LACERA Long
Term Care program would require the Board of Supervisors to adopt the
County Employees Retirement Law (CERL) Section 31696.1(b). To date,
the Board of Supervisors has not made this section operative.
Any and all administrative expenses incurred would be borne by MetLife.
Further, the LTC program would be an extension of the current agreement
LACERA has already established. The County would not have to formally
sponsor the program nor incur any risk of financial liability.
A motion was made by Mr. Morris, seconded by Mr. Harris, to approve
the recommendation. The motion passed unanimously.
- FOR INFORMATION
- Missing Department Number Project
While compiling data to be included in the first actuarial valuation
of the retiree medical, dental/vision, and life insurance benefits,
findings revealed that there were approximately 7,175 records that
did not have the County department number that members had been employed
in prior to retirement. The department numbers are a necessary component
of the member record due to the employer’s liability associated with
healthcare costs. While there is no impact to our members, there may
be an impact to the County and/or the outside district(s).
Up to this point, the employer’s portion had been fully paid by the
County. However, some accounts were paid incorrectly by the County.
This project was undertaken to ensure that the employer’s portion on
the identified accounts was being billed to the appropriate party.
All of the 7,175 records have been researched and are now in the process
of being updated. Of the total records researched only two of the outside
districts were actually affected, for a total of 81 employees. The
findings were communicated to the two districts and to the County CEO
staff. Per the County’s request, for members found to be a retiree
of one of these outside districts, the employer portion of the billing
is being transferred from the County to the outside district on a time
forward basis. An accurate reflection of the employer portion for the
81 employees identified is in the process of being made and will now
be appropriately billed to the responsible agency.
- Staff Activities Report for November, 2009
The staff activities report was discussed.
- CIGNA & Anthem Blue Cross Claims Experience
The CIGNA & Anthem Blue Cross Claims Experience reports through October,
2009 were discussed.
- Health Care Reform
Clay Levister discussed the November 17 Mercer webcast on health care
reform. Topics included employer reactions to proposed mandates on
excise taxes on generous plans, and a special focus on retiree health
care.
The 40% excise tax on “generous” coverage (e.g. $8,000/single coverage
and $21,000/family coverage) would be based on the Consumer Price Index
(CPI), which is significantly lower than the cost of inflation. Based
on Mercer’s national surveys, 25% of all employers will be subject
to a surcharge in 2013. Over time that number will grow, depending
on size and benefits. When asked how they would respond to an excise
tax, almost two-thirds of employers would cut benefits to avoid paying
the tax, increasing deductibles and co-insurance. About one-fourth
would shift the tax to their employees. Virtually none of the employers
would absorb the higher cost themselves.
Additional issues that will only affect retiree coverage offered by
employers are:
- Benefit offerings
- Limitations on plan cuts
- Part D changes
- Medicare Advantage
- Excise tax on Cadillac plans
- Pre-Medicare retirees
A larger number of participants are enrolled in Medicare Advantage
programs. Currently, capitation payments that CMS makes to Medicare
HMOs are, on average, greater than the cost of Medicare fee-for-service.
Reduction in subsidies to Medicare Advantage plans could lead to large
increase in premiums or benefit reductions. There could also potentially
be reductions in service areas.
- Federal Legislation
- Weekly Highlights – November 30, 2009
- Weekly Highlights – November 23, 2009
- Weekly Highlights – November 16, 2009
- Weekly Highlights – November 9, 2009
- Weekly Highlights – November 2, 2009
- MISCELLANEOUS
- PUBLIC COMMENT
- GOOD OF THE ORDER
(For discussion purposes only)
- ADJOURNMENT
12/10/09
|
|