|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
OOC MINUTES AUGUST 13, 2009 |
|
| |
|
| |
OPERATIONS & OVERSIGHT
COMMITTEE MINUTES 8-13-09
PRESENT
- Yves Chery, Chair
- Ed C. Morris, Vice Chair
- Edward L. Blecksmith
- James P. Harris
- Sadonya Antebi, Alternate
BOARD MEMBERS AT LARGE
- Les Robbins
- Simon S. Russin
STAFF, ADVISORS, PARTICIPANTS
- Robert Hill
- James Pu
- Walter Howey
- Robert Whitten
- Justin Stewart
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Chery at 11:20 a.m.
- APPOINTMENT OF VOTING MEMBER(S) IN THE EVENT ONE OR MORE REGULAR COMMITTEE
MEMBERS ARE ABSENT
All regular members of the Committee were present.
- APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 9, 2009
A motion was made by Mr. Morris seconded by Mr. Harris, to approve the minutes
of the regular meeting of July 9, 2009.
The motion passed unanimously.
- ACTION ITEMS
- Microfiche Media Conversion
In October, 2008 the Operations Oversight Committee authorized the release
of a Request for Quotations (RFQ) from vendors qualified to convert member
data in microfiche format to electronic images. Proposals were submitted by
six capable vendors with a genuine interest in the project, and staff has selected
one from the resulting short list for recommendation to the Committee.
The
proposals were evaluated in two phases. Phase I consisted of weighted ratings
against our criteria, which explicitly called for detailed descriptions of
a wide range of vendor capabilities, experience, and physical plant characteristics.
We also gave the vendors the option of including a second proposal with an
alternate approach. Once cost was applied to the technical proposals, the top
three ranking proposals were selected for further evaluation.
Phase II included
researching company profiles, reference checks, and site visits. Each vendor
was invited to LACERA’s offices to look at actual samples of our fiche and to ask any questions relevant to the project. All three vendors received written answers to all questions, and were given an opportunity to submit a “best and final” price
quote. The three finalists were ranked as follows:
- National Business Systems, Inc. (NBS)
- FNTI
- ImageScan
NBS was the most forthcoming in their technical proposal, and have all of the required controls in place as regards staffing and physical plant. Their best and final quote was also the lowest.
When we have large projects under consideration, but have not yet determined the complete scope, duration, or approximate cost, we request funding out of contingency. Therefore, our recommendation includes a request for funding out of contingency in an amount not to exceed $775,000, approximately 3% of the $26 million balance remaining in the 2009-2010 budget for contingency funding.
Recommendation: (1) Recommend the Board of Retirement instruct the Chief
Executive Officer to execute an agreement with National Business Systems,
Inc. (“NBS”)
for conversion of member data in microfiche format to electronic images,
at a cost not to exceed $775,000, subject to approval by LACERA Counsel; and
(2) Recommend the Board of Retirement approve funding from Contingency.
A motion
was made by Mr. Harris, seconded by Mr. Blecksmith, to approve the recommendation.
The motion passed unanimously.
- FOR INFORMATION
- Interest Crediting and the Impact on Member Accounts (oral presentation)
Robert Hill
Board policy is to credit annual interest equal to the actuarial assumed
earnings rate. Accordingly, 3.875% interest is credited to member and employer
reserves on December 31 and June 30 of each year, provided there is sufficient
realized investment income. Historically, LACERA has always had realized earnings,
and have therefore always posted an interest credit.
Interest crediting does
not affect members’ retirement allowances, as these are based on final comp,
years of service, and age. However, it does impact withdrawals, which are
based on accumulated contributions plus interest, the lump-sum cost of certain
contracts, and certain death benefits. Financing a purchase can also be impacted.
If a member elects to make installment payments, which include interest at the
assumed rate, that rate will be the contract rate and will not change based on
interest credited. If the assumed rate changes, new contracts would use the newly
adopted assumed rate.
- Disaster Recovery Exercise Report and Flooding on the 7th Floor in
May, 2009 James Pu
LACERA conducted its annual Disaster Recovery Test in May. Last year the mainframe
was restored remotely using a secure network connection across the Internet
for the first time, giving us the ability to activate and operate the mainframe
without sending staff to a dedicated recovery center. Following that success,
new objectives were tested this year:
- Determine whether IBM staff were capable of restoring our mainframe to full operation with no assistance from LACERA staff
- Determine whether IBM staff could successfully troubleshoot our DB2 database and resolve problems with no assistance from LACERA staff
- Establish and test a purely wireless temporary Call Center using wireless computers and cellular phones
- Access the mainframe using a cellular-based wireless computer
Overall, the exercise was a big success. The wireless and remote capabilities
offer great operational flexibility, while IBM’s ability to restore our mainframe
provides a new layer of assurance should our technical staff become unavailable
during a disaster.
On May 20, 2009, while a technician was performing routine cleaning of the air
conditioning units cooling LACERA’s technology centers, a high pressure water leak occurred. Water filled the fan room and migrated toward the Data Center housing LACERA’s
mainframe. Some flooding also occurred in the employee lunchroom, 7th floor hallways,
and the freight elevator. The water also reached the motor control for the 7th
floor air conditioning, damaging the control unit, before building staff could
shut off the main water supply.
LACERA and building management staff rallied to prevent water from damaging
vital equipment, using fans and other measures to maintain cooling to computer
systems in order to delay a potential shutdown from thermal overload. Due to
their efforts, a shutdown was unnecessary. Administrative Services, Systems,
and building personnel’s
quick response to this crisis prevented any loss of service or data.
- MISCELLANEOUS
- PUBLIC COMMENT
- GOOD OF THE ORDER
(For discussion purposes only)
- ADJOURNMENT
9/10/09
|
|