JULY
1, 2008, OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PROGRAM ACTUARIAL VALUATION
The following
is the opening letter to the Los Angeles County Other Postemployment Benefits
Program (OPEB) Actuarial Valuation document. The major findings of the valuation
are contained in this report. This report reflects the benefit provisions
in effect as of July 1, 2008, and the retiree health plan premium rates in
effect as of July 1, 2008, and July 1, 2009. Please note that the table of
contents is linked to the various sections of the document.
Click
here to access the entire Other Postemployment Benefits Program Actuarial
Valuation document.

June
22, 2009
Mr.
Gregg Rademacher
Chief Executive Officer
LACERA 300 North Lake Avenue
Pasadena, CA 91101-4199
Re:
July 1, 2008, Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) Actuarial Valuation
Dear
Gregg:
As
requested, we have prepared an actuarial valuation of the retiree medical,
dental/vision, and life insurance benefits covering the retired Los Angeles
County workers who also participate in the Los Angeles County Employees
Retirement Association (LACERA) retirement benefit program. These benefits
are collectively referred to in this report as the Los Angeles County OPEB
Benefits Program, or the “Program”. The major findings of the valuation
are contained in this report. This report reflects the benefit provisions
in effect as of July 1, 2008, and the retiree health plan premium rates
in effect as of July 1, 2008, and July 1, 2009.
In
preparing this report, we relied, without audit, on information (some oral
and some in writing) supplied by Los Angeles County, LACERA and Mercer
Health & Benefits. This information includes, but is not limited to: benefit
descriptions, membership data, and financial information. In our examination
of these data, we have found the data to be reasonably consistent and comparable
with data used for other purposes. In some cases, where the data was incomplete,
we made assumptions as noted in Table C-11. Since the valuation results
are dependent on the integrity of the data supplied, the results can be
expected to differ if the underlying data is incomplete or missing or if
our assumptions regarding incomplete data are incorrect. It should be noted
that if any data or other information is inaccurate or incomplete, our
calculations may need to be revised.
We
certify that all costs, liabilities, rates of interest, health cost trend
rates, and other factors under the Program have been determined on the
basis of actuarial assumptions and methods which are individually reasonable
(taking into account the experience of the Program and reasonable expectations)
and which, in combination, offer our best estimate of anticipated experience
affecting the Program. Nevertheless, the emerging costs will vary from
those presented in this report to the extent that actual experience differs
from that projected by the actuarial assumptions.
The
retirement benefit related demographic and economic assumptions used in
this report are based on those developed for the July 1, 2008, valuation
of the LACERA retirement benefit program. The OPEB demographic and economic
assumptions are based on the results of our 2008 OPEB Investigation of
Experience, a report that was produced by Milliman as LACERA’s actuary,
with oversight and approval from Mercer as LACERA’s health benefits consultant,
Buck Consultants as Los Angeles County’s actuary, and Rael & Letson, as
the actuary for SEIU Local 721. Thus, the assumptions were the result of
a collaborative effort by these various stakeholder groups. The assumptions
are summarized in Appendix A. The County has the final decision regarding
the appropriateness of the assumptions and should adopt them based on the
joint consultants’ recommendations.
Future
actuarial measurements may differ significantly from the current measurements
presented in this report due to such factors as the following: Program
experience differing from that anticipated by the economic or demographic
assumptions; changes in economic or demographic assumptions; increases
or decreases expected as part of the natural operation of the methodology
used for these measurements such as the end of an amortization period;
and changes in Program provisions or applicable law. Due to the limited
scope of our assignment, we did not perform an analysis of the potential
range of future measurements.
Actuarial
computations under GASB No. 43 and No. 45 are for purposes of fulfilling
financial accounting requirements for LACERA and Los Angeles County (the
employer) respectively. LACERA needs to report under GASB 43 since the
benefit payments flow through LACERA’s financial accounts. The calculations
in the enclosed exhibits have been made on a basis consistent with our
understanding of GASB No. 43 and No. 45, as well as the County’s funding
goals. Determinations for purposes other than meeting these financial accounting
requirements may be significantly different from the results contained
in this report. Accordingly, additional determinations may be needed for
other purposes.
Any
distribution of this report must be in its entirety including this cover
letter, unless prior written consent from Milliman is obtained. Milliman’s
work product was prepared exclusively for LACERA under our contract with
LACERA for a specific and limited purpose. It is a complex technical analysis
that assumes a high level of knowledge concerning LACERA’s operations,
and uses LACERA’s data and other data provided Milliman, which Milliman
has not audited. It is not for the use or benefit of any third party for
any purpose. Any third party recipient of Milliman’s work product, including
Los Angeles County or the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD),
who desires professional guidance should not rely upon Milliman’s work
product, but should engage qualified professionals for advice appropriate
to its own specific needs.
The
consultants who worked on this assignment are employee benefit actuaries.
Milliman’s advice is not intended to be a substitute for qualified legal
or accounting counsel.
On
the basis of the foregoing, we hereby certify that, to the best of our
knowledge and belief, this information is complete and accurate and has
been prepared in accordance with generally recognized and accepted actuarial
principles and practices. We are members of the American Academy of Actuaries
and meet the Qualification Standards to render the actuarial opinion contained
herein.
We
would like to express our appreciation to LACERA staff members, Los Angeles
County, SEIU Local 721, Mercer, Rael & Letson, and Buck Consultants who
gave substantial assistance in supplying the data on which this report
is based. We respectfully submit the following report, and we look forward
to discussing it with you.
Sincerely,
 |
 |
Robert
L. Schmidt , F.S.A., EA, M.A.A.A.
Consulting Actuary |
Karen
I. Steffen, F.S.A., EA, M.A.A.A.
Consulting Actuary |
RLS/pap
cc: Mr. Robert Hill,
LACERA
7/8/09
|